![make a spring in rhinoceros 5 make a spring in rhinoceros 5](https://artprojectsforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Rhino-5.jpg)
The bugs listed above should be addressed first. Taking after Microsoft Word for your UI is not the best way to go.įinally, I think Rhino 4 is not ready to ship. Rhino could use some really good UI and User Experience designers for what is, at its core, an excellent program. And they make the program much less usable for someone like me. But the wishes and bugs above I see as fairly glaring flaws that have been around since I've started using Rhino. I love the program and think it is a fanstastic modeller. I've written some RhinoScript and used Rhino an enormous amount for several years.
![make a spring in rhinoceros 5 make a spring in rhinoceros 5](https://static.food4rhino.com/s3fs-public/styles/large/public/users-files/pennjamin/app/screenshot_fluid.jpg)
Postscript: I guess some of these issues are trivial for a programmer. Go Parametric! Emulate Max and Maya in this regard but keep Rhino's amazing precision, clarity and interoperability. How is that useful? Why can't objects receive a human readable name upon creation like (again) Maya? This is so much more accessible and would tie into the dynamic creation of objects in scripting much better. First there is that huge machine-readable name. Naming! Naming in Rhino is so inelegant and difficult. When it works it's great but it's not very accessible. Scripting in Rhino is pretty buried and difficult to learn and implement. It's extremely elegant, integrated and provides an easy way to learn the language. In Maya, whatever you do outputs usable script. The command/macro/script distinction is pretty strange. Make RhinoScript a much more integrated part of the program. Robust, much more beautiful and complete, very, very large dev community. Why isn't something like an adaption of PHP possible instead. VBscript is somehow existentially tainted with Microsoft.